• Specific News

  • May 2021
    S M T W T F S
  • Donate Us

    Category 1: at the following link https://www.gofundme.com/manage/assistance-to-victims-of-military-coup-in-burma (or) Category 2: https://matupi.org/aids/

Political Analysis on the fate of Burma links via Taiwan (China) and Crimea (Russia) versus US-led allies with a strong partner Japan:

By Jonathan Thang

A few weeks ago, I was extremely worried when President Biden announced Russia’s role in the US election and called out President Putin as a “killer”, which escalate high-level tension between the two countries. Moreover, once President Biden announced the “genocide acts” to Turkey which occurred during World War II mass killing of Armenians. Instead of concentrating on the containment policy upon China, engaging more fronts would high level escalation with other countries could escape China from its original purposed. In that case, the matter of Burma would be not a priority and perhaps a longer persecution period in Burma.

The Burmese are helpless and powerless encircled by semi-democratic countries from South East Asia; communist China, Laos, and Vietnam; authoritarian or military dictator in Cambodia and Thailand. On the other hand, overburdened by internal issues in India and overcrowded populations affair management in Bangladesh. Having such kind of political environment, really tempted Min Aung Hlaing’s ego interest to take a military coup in Burma.

Ofocurse China’s opportunist evil eyes on Burma’s resources and BRI project via Burma is one of undeniable reason which harmed the country of Burma and terrorized the peaceful nature of Burma. But now, I am very sure that the military coup in Burma is bound to fail along with Min Aung Hlaing and all the members of SAC without dignity.

I personally had encountered one of the CCP members who used to work at Kyauk Phu Deep-sea project, praising the investments of China really helped the level of living standard and economic development in Burma. He tried to get appreciation from the Burmese to thanks China for overall their involvement in Burma. I politely answered him that China is a great economic superpower country in the world and China could lead the world in innovation and sharing knowledge in know-how to fight against poverty, how China itself has risen up from starvation within a period of a half-century. Of course One party administration has no opposition voice to hinder any project and implementation, which could really speed up any government’s project and determination by undermining the freedom and rights of humans. I told him that, China should thank the Burmese people and still owe plenty of gratitude for able to absorb all natural resources from Burma as almost free. Therefore a couple aids are not supposed to fill the gap of what the Burmese have sacrificed for China’s interest.

We “MBF”, members of “Myanmar Peace & Political Analyst Team” analyzed what China has done in Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Pakistan, and some African countries by debt-trap economic investment, it is clearer than before that China’s intention to lead the world is not for good but to let other down and grip the power in ill spirits. No civilized person will ever think to harm others for our own good and this is something the World has to know before too late. The reason World’s political scenario has already witnessed that the World is watching every step that China has moved and ready to counteract it. When I said about China, I only mean directly to members of the CCP, cos majority of Chinese are innocent and they don’t have any involvement on what the CCP government is bullying around the world. Moreover, majority of Chinese are living as “under house arrest” within China.

The measure took by the US & Japan on global affairs:

March 16, On March 16, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met in Tokyo with the Japanese Minister for Foreign Affairs Toshimitsu Motegi and reaffirmed the vital importance of the U.S.-Japan Alliance to promoting peace, security, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region. Secretary Blinken and Foreign Minister Motegi reaffirmed their commitment to the denuclearization of the DPRK and committed to expanding opportunities for U.S.-Japan-Republic of Korea trilateral cooperation to address the challenges of today and the future.

The Secretary and the Foreign Minister also highlighted the importance of further strengthening U.S.-Japan cooperation on climate change, clean energy, cybersecurity, supply chains, COVID-19, and the restoration of democracy in Burma. They pledged to further discuss ways to deepen our coordination on these priority issues and our shared vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific region.

Our team is eager to follow closely international news which might somehow directly or indirectly affect Burma. We have discovered such as World leaders have put major power diplomacy on full display this month with a flurry of international trips, meetings, and phone calls.

Chinese President Xi Jinping undoubtedly devoted his greatest attention to the April 16 summit between U.S. President Joe Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga. But it was the less-touted phone conversation between Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin three days before the Suga summit that may have astonished a watchful Xi. In their second call since late January, Biden proposed an in-person meeting with Putin in a third country in the coming months.

Xi has received no such invitation to an in-person meeting with the American president. Xi and Biden, who have known each other for more than a decade, held a lengthy phone call on Feb. 10 ahead of the Lunar New Year holiday. But with diplomats from both countries clashing in Alaska last month, there has been no enthusiasm on either side to arrange a summit.

Biden’s proposal to Putin is especially shocking for China as it set a time frame for the meeting: in the coming months. Speculation suggests the two leaders will meet in June, which would be particularly uncomfortable for Xi. On July 1, the Chinese Communist Party celebrates the 100th anniversary of its establishment a big moment for Xi, who doubles as the party’s general secretary.

U.S. President Joe Biden’s summit proposal to Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin might be an attempt to resolve outstanding U.S. foreign policy issues so the White House can better deal with China.

Why would Biden want to meet with Putin? Chinese policymakers are analyzing this move. Is the American president trying to settle issues around the world; such as the recently announced U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan? So, he can pour his time and energy into taking on China? Suspicion in Beijing is mounting.

Russia announced on Thursday that it will end the country’s massive troop buildup near Ukraine, saying the military exercises had completed. If Xi had any doubts about whether Putin was preparing for a summit with Biden, they must be gone. From China’s standpoint, its relationship with Russia is good. The two countries have been strengthening their partnership on various fronts to counter the U.S. But China and Russia are not allies. There is no guarantee that Moscow will always take Beijing’s side.

Xi likely had these developments in mind Wednesday when he made the last-minute decision to attend Biden’s climate summit, which begins Thursday. From Beijing, Xi will “give an important speech,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying announced.

The Chinese leader had dragged his feet on attending the summit, worried that he might play into Biden’s hands and face tough demands on climate, on top of U.S. criticism regarding Beijing’s pressure on Taiwan and human rights issues in Xinjiang and Hong Kong.

Biden sent John Kerry, the special presidential envoy for climate, to Shanghai on April 14. Kerry, who served as President Barack Obama’s secretary of state, held a video talk with Chinese Vice Premier Han Zheng — one of the seven members of China’s top decision-making body, the Politburo Standing Committee — who was in Beijing.Simultaneously, Biden made another key diplomatic move across the Taiwan Strait.

A day after Kerry arrived on the mainland, an unofficial American delegation was in Taipei for talks with Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen. The delegation included former Sen. Chris Dodd, who is close to Biden, and former deputy secretaries of state Richard Armitage and James Steinberg.

It was a delicate balancing act for Biden. While signaling his willingness to cooperate with China on climate change, the president demonstrated his support for Taiwan on the security front.

It was also a calculated step toward his April 16 talks with Suga, during which peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait became a focal point.

Xi, for his part, launched a diplomatic counteroffensive. He held a previously unannounced video summit on climate change on April 16 with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Xi was not going to sit back and let Biden take the initiative on climate.

Beijing’s relationship with the European Union has been rocky in recent months after the latter imposed sanctions on China over human rights issues in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.But climate change is a topic that the leaders of China, France, and Germany can discuss comfortably. They exchanged views on the investment pact between China and the EU, which the two sides signed in the lead-up to Biden’s inauguration but which has since stalled.

Chinese President Xi Jinping has launched a diplomatic counteroffensive, discussing climate change with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in a virtual meeting on April 16. © Reuters

Meanwhile, on the U.S.-Russia front, another unexpected move puzzles policymakers in Beijing:

On April 15 — only two days after the phone call between Biden and Putin — the U.S. played hardball with Moscow, slapping new sanctions on Russian companies and individuals and expelling 10 Russian diplomats. The sanctions cited “harmful foreign activities” by the Russian government, including the ongoing occupation and repression in Crimea, the Ukrainian peninsula that Russia seized in 2014.

Though many miles away, Beijing has a strong interest in Crimea’s future because the issue overlaps politically with Taiwan. If push comes to shove, China might attempt to take over Taiwan by force, just as Russia did in Crimea.
The global tug of war among Xi, Biden, and Putin over Taiwan and Ukraine holds the key to understanding the recent flurry of intricate diplomatic activities by the world’s major powers.

Though the U.S. and Russia are unlikely to draw closer quickly, China is still on its toes.

“Biden has declared China to be the most serious competitor to the U.S.,” one Chinese analyst observed. “There is no logic for U.S.-Russia relations to turn worse than U.S.-China relations.”

As if to prove that, Putin announced on Monday that he will attend Biden’s climate summit — brushing aside the new U.S. sanctions on Moscow. If Putin hopes for an in-person summit with Biden in the coming months, it makes sense for the Russian leader to attend the climate event as a prelude to the bilateral meeting.Russian servicemen take part in a festive procession on the anniversary of the Crimean treaty signing in Sevastopol, Crimea. © Reuters

China’s careful analysis of major power diplomacy was seen in its staggering response to the Biden-Suga joint statement, in which the U.S. and Japan mentioned Taiwan in a summit statement for the first time since 1969.
Though the mere mention of Taiwan, which Beijing regards as a “core interest,” is unacceptable from China’s standpoint, the Japan-U.S. joint statement was in line with expectations. That is why the first official Chinese reaction came through the country’s embassy in Washington.

That was followed by the Chinese Embassy in Tokyo, and then finally a statement from the Foreign Ministry in Beijing.China criticized the Japan-U.S. statement for expressing concerns about Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjiang, and other issues and warned that Beijing “will take all necessary measures to resolutely defend its sovereignty, security and development interests.”

But after the war of nerves, a forward-looking U.S.-China joint statement concerning climate change was issued on Sunday China time. It came after the Japan-U.S. summit and related events in Washington ended, and also after Kerry had left Shanghai.

Chinese President Xi Jinping tells the Boao Forum for Asia on April 20 that global “openness and integration is an unstoppable historical trend,” as he denounces supply chain decoupling in the high-tech sector. © Xinhua/AP
Looking back at this month’s events — the Biden-Putin phone call, Kerry’s visit to China, the unofficial U.S. delegation’s trip to Taiwan, Suga’s visit to Washington, and the U.S.-led climate summit — these seem to have been firmly incorporated into the White House’s broader strategy toward China.

China wants to take effective countermeasures. A soft target for China is Japan.
Beijing might begin with intensifying incursions by the country’s vessels into the waters around the Japanese-administered Senkaku Islands, which China claims and calls the Diaoyu Islands.

China might also take a tougher stance against Japan’s recently announced decision to release treated water from its crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant into the sea.

But bashing Japan heavily may not be the best policy. The Chinese economy would suffer a serious blow in the medium and long term if the decoupling of mutually dependent semiconductors and other industrial supply chains progresses quickly.

Beijing hosts the Winter Olympics in February 2022. How will China move, while being careful not to add fuel to calls in Western countries for a boycott of the quadrennial sports extravaganza?On Tuesday, Xi attended the opening ceremony for the annual conference of the Boao Forum for Asia in the southern Chinese province of Hainan via video link. In a speech, he stressed opposition to decoupling in the high-tech sector and “a new cold war.”

“In this age of economic globalization, openness and integration is an unstoppable historical trend,” Xi said. “Attempts to ‘erect walls’ or ‘decouple’ run counter to the law of economics and market principles. They would hurt others’ interests without benefiting oneself.”

When will the U.S. and China set the first in-person meeting between Xi and Biden? Chinese policymakers might need to watch and wait for the Biden-Putin summit to plan their next move. By the time, Taiwan and Crimea issues are solved, Burma will eventually free from the economic & political colonization of China.

Reference from:

1. US State department office


3. Xinhua news

4. Associate Press news (AP)

5. Reuter news


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: